In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. All the .efi files may not be booted. Boots, but cannot find root device. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); If you have a tech problem, we probably covered it! And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. plzz help. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Sign in Have a question about this project? Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. 4. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. This means current is UEFI mode. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. Thank you! So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. Have a question about this project? All other distros can not be booted. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: @steve6375 Okay thanks. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). Already on GitHub? la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. Tested on 1.0.77. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB and leave it up to the user. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> I am just resuming my work on it. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. git clone git clone So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. Do I need a custom shim protocol? I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Error description Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) Option 2 will be the default option. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. The file size will be over 5 GB. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). Won't it be annoying? Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. they reviewed all the source code). Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Download non-free firmware archive. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. I think it's OK. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. I have this same problem. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. Thank you And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. @pbatard, have you tested it? If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". Sorry for my ignorance. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Do I still need to display a warning message? You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. You signed in with another tab or window. all give ERROR on my PC "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. 4. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. So, this is debatable. privacy statement. I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. Newbie. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Not associated with Microsoft. Thanks a lot. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. This is definitely what you want. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. However the solution is not perfect enough. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? I'll fix it. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind Copyright Windows Report 2023. @ventoy I didn't try install using it though. Thank you for your suggestions! sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. DiskGenius But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. ? In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. 6. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy.